Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Emerg Nurs. 2011 Dec 3;38(1):9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2011.09.001

TABLE.

Summary of articles about PH ECG

Author (date of publication) Purpose Inclusion criteria Outcome variables Level of evidence
Canto et al8 (1997) To compare characteristics and outcomes of patients with or without PH ECG Hospitalized patients with AMI who presented by ambulance to emergency department Time to first ECG, time to reperfusion therapy, clinical outcomes (reinfarction, heart failure, hypotension, death) IIb
Ioannidis et al9 (2001) To assess diagnostic performance of PH ECG Studies about patients with chest pain who received PH ECG; both RCT and non-RCT studies included for meta-analysis Sensitivity, specificity, clinical outcomes (death) Ia
Brainard et al6 (2005) To compare time to reperfusion in patients with or without PH ECG Studies that reported time savings of PH ECG; all needed to report original data Onset of symptoms—to—reperfusion time Ia
Curtis et al7 (2006) To evaluate prevalence of PH ECG and effects of PH ECG on reperfusion times Patients with STEMI or new left bundle branch block who received acute reperfusion therapy Door-to-drug time and door-to-balloon time IIb
Eckstein et al10 (2009) To compare time to reperfusion in patients with or without PH ECG Patients with admission diagnosis of STEMI Door-to-balloon time IIb
Diercks et al12 (2009) To compare time to reperfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with or without PH ECG Patients with admission diagnosis of STEMI Door-to-balloon time, clinical outcomes (death, heart failure, cardiogenic shock) IIb
Drew et al13 (2011) To compare time to reperfusion and clinical outcomes (scene time) in patients with or without PH ECG Patients activating EMS with chest pain and/or anginal equivalent Scene time, time to first ECG, time to reperfusion, clinical outcomes (death) Ib

AMI, Acute myocardial I’nfarction; RCT, randomized control trial.