Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 17;6(9):1616–1638. doi: 10.1002/acn3.50850

Table 1.

Preservation of differential co‐expression networks

Tissue Origin Histopathology Data source Tissue Z summary score M1 Z summary score M2
Neural Malignant TCGA WHO grade III IDH1wt astrocytoma 26.8 46.5
Neural Malignant TCGA WHO grade II IDH1mut 1p/19q codeleted oligodendroglioma 63.3 48.8
Neural Malignant TCGA WHO grade III IDH1mut 1p/19q codeleted oligodendroglioma 16.4 18.9
Neural Malignant TCGA Glioblastoma 23.0 67.1
Neural Malignant GEO Glioblastoma (GSE77530) 12.8 29.9
Neural Malignant GEO Glioblastoma (non‐enhancing) (GSE59612) 30.0 18.9
Neural Malignant GEO Glioblastoma (enhancing) (GSE59612) 3.7 45.9
Nonneural Malignant TCGA Colon adenocarcinoma 0.8 33.8
Nonneural Malignant TCGA Liver hepatocellular carcinoma 1.4 58.8
Nonneural Malignant TCGA Lung adenocarcinoma 2.0 101.9
Nonneural Nonmalignant GTEx Colon 1.1 15.0
Nonneural Nonmalignant GTEx Lung 0.5 16.6
Nonneural Nonmalignant GTEx Liver 0.1 6.9
Neural Nonmalignant GTEx Cerebral cortex 11.8 –1.3

Preservation of modules M1 and M2 in neural and non‐neural malignant and non‐cancerous tissues assessed by the composite network preservation statistic Z summary.30 Z summary scores >10 represent strong evidence for preservation, Z summary < 2 is interpreted as no preservation and Z summary 2–10 suggests weak to moderate preservation. LGA expression was used as the reference set to investigate M1 preservation and AA to explore module M2 preservation in other datasets.