Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Maltreat. 2019 Mar 27;24(4):389–399. doi: 10.1177/1077559519835975

Table 3.

Path Analyses Parameters of the Associations Between CM, Impulsivity, and N-back Activity.

Paths B (SE) β 95% CI of B
Direct effects
 CM → UPPS-P 1.730 (3.270) .112 [−4.679, 8.139]
 CM → N-back Activity −.666 (.180) −.533 [−1.019, −.313]***
 N-back Activity → UPPS-P −6.060 (2.966) −.491 [−11.873, −.247]*
Indirect effect
 CM → UPPS-P 4.038 (1.967) [.183, 7.893]*

Note. N = 30. The model is just identified. SE = standard error; comparative fit index (CI) = confidence interval; CM = CTQ total score; UPPS-P = measure total score; N-back Activity = average neural activity during N-back task. CFI = 1.0, Standardized Root Mean Residual (SRMR) = .000.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.