Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 27;10:4413. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12404-1

Table 1.

Quantification results for the nitrogen heterocyclic molecules targeted in the present study

Name of molecule Molecular formula Molecular structure Mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of the protonated ion Yield (ppm)a by a C18 column Yield (ppm)a by a HypercarbTM column
Nucleobases
  Cytosine C4H5N3O (1) 112.0505 2 1
  Uracil C4H4N2O2 (2) 113.0346 1 4
  Thymine C5H6N2O2 (3) 127.0502 2 <3
  Adenine C5H5N5 (4) 136.0618 0.1
  Hypoxanthine C5H4N4O (5) 137.0458 0.06 0.2
  Guanine C5H5N5O (6) 152.0567
  Xanthine C5H4N4O2 (7) 153.0407 0.04
Nitrogen heterocycles
  Pyridazine C4H4N2 (8) 81.0447 19 31
  Pyrimidine C4H4N2 (9) 81.0447 <1 <1
  Pyrazine C4H4N2 (10) 81.0447 35 41
  Purine C5H4N4 (11) 121.0509 2 5
  Imidazole C3H4N2 (12) 69.0447 1152 1163
  Pyrazole C3H4N2 (13) 69.0447 89 20
  4-Imidazolcarboxylic acid C4H4N2O2 (14) 113.0346 b 139
  Glycine anhydride C4H6N2O2 (15) 115.0502 3 42
  Dihydrouracil C4H6N2O2 (16) 115.0502 <1 61

For backing up the quantitative evaluation of those N-containing target molecules, we conducted the two independent chromatographic separations and co-injection determination with the corresponding authentic standard reagent (Supplementary Note 1). The small scale detection and calibration lines of the orbitrap mass spectrometry were also validated as shown in Supplementary Fig. 35

aRelative weight with relevance to the total deposited gas in part per million (1 ppm = 0.0001%) normalised with each carbon abundance

bPositively identified but not quantified