Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2017 Jan 20;37(1):97–101. [Article in Chinese] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2017.01.18

4.

两组显效率比较

Response rates to treatment in active and sham rTMS groups

Item	HAMD					Total
Item	Recovery	Significantly effective	Effective	Ineffective	Responder rates (%)	Total
Active rTMS	4	23	35	18	77.5	80
Sham rTMS	0	23	29	46	53.1	98
χ²			15.470
P			0.002