Table 2.
Logistic regression analyses examining associations between neighbourhood built environment factors and metabolic risk (any metabolic risk factor present).
| Model | All n = 204 | Females n = 100 | Males n = 104 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neighbourhood Exposure Variable | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | p Value | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | p Value | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | p Value |
| Unadjusted | ||||||
| Net Residential density × 102 | 0.954 (0.835, 1.089) | 0.485 | 0.986 (0.808, 1.205) | 0.893 | 0.918 (0.754, 1.117) | 0.392 |
| Land use mix × 102 | 0.995 (0.977, 1.014) | 0.606 | 0.983 (0.955, 1.011) | 0.233 | 1.020 (0.988, 1.054) | 0.228 |
| Street network connectivity | 0.981 (0.927, 1.037) | 0.497 | 1.043 (0.956, 1.139) | 0.346 | 0.942 (0.871, 1.019) | 0.138 |
| Pedestrian network connectivity, % | 1.011 (0.987, 1.036) | 0.36 | 0.981 (0.949, 1.045) | 0.271 | 1.047 (1.008, 1.088) | 0.018 |
| Accessibility to open spaces, % | 1.000 (0.994, 1.007) | 0.897 | 0.992 (0.977, 1.007) | 0.296 | 1.004 (0.994, 1.014) | 0.469 |
| Accessibility to destinations | 1.008 (0.978, 1.039) | 0.604 | 0.975 (0.930, 1.022) | 0.296 | 1.038 (0.993, 1.085) | 0.096 |
| Traffic speed exposure, % | 1.004 (0.991,1.018) | 0.567 | 0.998 (0.976, 1.022) | 0.895 | 1.009 (0.988, 1.029) | 0.409 |
| Distance to school, km | 1.003 (0.920, 1.093) | 0.947 | 1.087 (0.959, 1.232) | 0.190 | 0.941 (0.831, 1.065) | 0.337 |
| School route topography | 1.003 (0.974, 1.033) | 0.817 | 0.943 (0.879, 1.012) | 0.106 | 1.029 (0.982, 1.078) | 0.234 |
| Adjusted for household socio-economic status | ||||||
| Net Residential density × 102 | 0.979 (0.848, 1.130) | 0.774 | 0.967 (0.784, 1.193) | 0.755 | 0.992 (0.802, 1.228) | 0.944 |
| Land use mix × 102 | 0.993 (0.973, 1.014) | 0.532 | 0.986 (0.957, 1.015) | 0.347 | 1.010 (0.973, 1.048) | 0.599 |
| Street network connectivity | 0.978 (0.920, 1.040) | 0.48 | 1.026 (0.936, 1.126) | 0.581 | 0.951 (0.871, 1.039) | 0.267 |
| Pedestrian network connectivity, % | 1.018 (0.992, 1.045) | 0.183 | 0.997 (0.961,1.034) | 0.853 | 1.048 (1.003, 1.095) | 0.037 |
| Accessibility to open spaces, % | 1.000 (0.944, 1.007) | 0.892 | 0.992 (0.976, 1.008) | 0.322 | 1.005 (0.994, 1.016) | 0.347 |
| Accessibility to destinations | 1.016 (0.983, 1.050) | 0.353 | 0.998 (0.945, 1.055) | 0.950 | 1.023 (0.977, 1.072) | 0.331 |
| Traffic speed exposure, % | 1.008 (0.993, 1.023) | 0.318 | 1.000 (0.973, 1.026) | 0.975 | 1.012 (0.989, 1.035) | 0.314 |
| Distance to school, km | 0.987 (0.896, 1.088) | 0.798 | 1.018 (0.880, 1.179) | 0.807 | 0.962 (0.839, 1.104) | 0.585 |
| School route topography | 1.000 (0.970, 1.033) | 0.981 | 0.927 (0.854, 1.006) | 0.070 | 1.039 (0.981, 1.101) | 0.194 |
Note: bold signifies significant at p < 0.05.