Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 11;16(18):3351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183351

Table 5.

The results of spatial error model and spatial lag model.

Variable Spatial Error Model Spatial Lag Model
Iwg Iww Isw Iwg Iww Isw
Gwg −0.0365 *
(−1.9778)
−0.0411 **
(−2.4748)
Gww −0.6824 *
(−1.8778)
−0.7647 *
(−2.1381)
Gsw −0.0068
(−1.046)
− 0.0041 *
(−2.1283)
Pwg −0.0111 *
(−1.8061)
−0.0066 **
Pww −0.0013 *
(−1.9614)
−0.0026 *
(−2.0116)
Psw −0.0069 *
(−2.2086)
−0.0076 *
(−1.9754)
Gwg*Pwg −0.087 **
(−2.1017)
−0.1736 **
(−2.3383)
Gww*Pww −0.1146 *
(−2.0747)
−0.1654 *
(−2.0353)
Gsw*Psw −0.1416 *
(−2.3028)
−0.0786 **
(−2.1017)
Psg 0.1143
(1.2355)
0.1641
(1.5002)
0.0662
(1.5410)
0.0886
(1.0274)
0.1753 *
(1.9651)
0.0712 *
(2.2356)
Neu 0.0602
(1.1122)
0.0501 *
(1.7254)
0.0602
(1.0701)
0.0563
(1.6107)
0.0441 *
(2.2417)
0.0613
(1.2221)
Dpe −0.0029
(−1.3168)
−0.0008 *
(−1.5062)
−0.0023
(−1.0059)
−0.0024 **
(−2.0846)
−0.0016 *
(−1.5313)
−0.0026
(−1.3059)
C −46.2304
(−1.2241)
−18.9251
(−0.9884)
210.8751
(1.1452)
−44.9762
(−1.2247)
−11.7671 *
(−2.2085)
215.7221
(0.9061)
Adj R 2 0.6861 0.7001 0.5872 0.9503 0.8762 0.7681
F value 18.8531 22.9802 37.9052 33.7651 29.9765 45.8711

Note: The t-test value is in brackets. *, ** are significant at the levels of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively.