Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 11;16(18):3361. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183361

Table 3.

Comparison of the means of variables of interest between groups.

Variables Non-NSSI
(n = 277)
M (SD)
Moderate NSSI
(n = 69)
M (SD)
Severe NSSI
(n = 92)
M (SD)
Group
Comparison
F(2435) d
2)
Post Hoc
Comparison
DERS strategies 19.18(6.73) 21.43(7.10) 25.60(6.95) 30.74 ***   0.68
       (0.12)
s > m > n
DERS non-acceptance 15.08(4.73) 16.80(4.85) 18.53(5.09) 18.56 ***   0.56
       (0.08)
s > n, m > n
DERS impulse 12.73(5.18) 14.94(6.13) 18.92(6.28) 42.91 ***   0.80
       (0.17)
s > m > n
DERS goals 15.94(4.85) 16.30(4.99) 17.99(4.69) 6.23 **     0.27
       (0.03)
s > n
DERS awareness 14.40(4.69) 15.53(5.27) 17.24(5.46) 11.56 ***   0.43
       (0.05)
s > n
DERS clarity 10.29(3.64) 11.47(4.24) 12.69(4.56) 13.37 ***   0.48
       (0.06)
s > n
DERS total 87.60(20.72) 96.46(24.35) 110.97(21.38) 41.44 ***   0.79
       (0.16)
s > m > n
Negative affect 22.04(7.94) 25.45(9.08) 28.83(10.24) 22.44 ***   0.62
       (0.09)
s > m > n
Positive affect 29.87(7.58) 28.58(8.60) 27.36(8.70)   3.60 *      0.25
       (0.02)
s > n

DERS: Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, NSSI: non-suicidal self-injury, M: mean, SD: standard deviation, d: effect size, η2: partial eta squared; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.