Table 4. Results of the two-way ANOVA.
| Variable | Gradient effect | Substrate effect | Gradient x Substrate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed | F = 0.984; df = 1; p = 0.377 | F = 0.146; df = 1; p = 0.722 | F = 1.504; df = 1; p = 0.287 |
| Duty factor | F = 0.080; df = 1; p = 0.791 | F = 1.720; df = 1; p = 0.260 | F = 0.460; df = 1; p = 0.535 |
| Stride length | F = 0.046; df = 1; p = 0.841 | F = 3.166; df = 1; p = 0.150 | F = 0.980; df = 1; p = 0.378 |
| Relative stride length | F = 1.000; df = 1; p = 0.374 | F = 0.001; df = 1; p = 0.977 | F = 3.380; df = 1; p = 0.140 |
| Stride frequency | F = 1.463; df = 1; p = 0.293 | F = 0.138; df = 1; p = 0.729 | F = 0.281; df = 1; p = 0.624 |
| bCOM height | F = 4.108; df = 1; p = 0.113 | F = 24.874; df = 1; p = 0.008 | F = 28.139; df = 1; p = 0.006 |
| External work | F = 19.260; df = 1; p = 0.012 | F = 4.645; df = 1; p = 0.097 | F = 0.096; df = 1; p = 0.772 |
| Internal work | F = 9.041; df = 1; p = 0.040 | F = 33.972; df = 1; p = 0.004 | F = 1.677; df = 1; p = 0.265 |
| Total work | F = 19.204; df = 1; p = 0.012 | F = 4.672; df = 1; p = 0.097 | F = 0.096; df = 1; p = 0.773 |
| Vertical work | F = 19.191; df = 1; p = 0.012 | F = 4.506; df = 1; p = 0.101 | F = 0.108; df = 1; p = 0.759 |
| Horizontal work | F = 5.642; df = 1; p = 0.076 | F = 17.760; df = 1; p = 0.014 | F = 4.090; df = 1; p = 0.113 |
| Recovery | F = 5.622; df = 1; p = 0.077 | F = 2.038; df = 1; p = 0.227 | F = 1.656; df = 1; p = 0.268 |
Notes.
The bold text indicates results with significant differences, p < 0.05.