Skip to main content
. 2019 May 7;40(12):3561–3574. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24616

Table 2.

Number of times that each video (awe, Pos = positive videos; Ntr = neutral videos) was assigned to the analytical (compared to the absorption) condition for all participants. The proportion of videos presented in the analytical condition is presented between brackets

Video 1 Video 2 Video 3 Video 4 Video 5 Video 6 Video 7 Video 8
Awe # 14 (0.45) 16 (0.52) 14 (0.45) 14 (0.45) 22 (0.71) 17 (0.55) 16 (0.52) 11 (0.36)
Pos # 12 (0.39) 17 (0.55) 16 (0.52) 18 (0.58) 16 (0.52) 18 (0.58) 15 (0.48) 12 (0.39)
Ntr # 17 (0.55) 17 (0.55) 14 (0.45) 15 (0.48) 13 (0.42) 13 (0.42) 15 (0.48) 20 (0.65)