Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 21;50(4):1152–1159. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26723

Table 1.

Results of the ROC Curve Analysis, Along With Their 95% Confidence Intervals, for the MR Datasets

Dataset Sensitivity,% Specificity,% AUC Accuracy,% PPV,% NPV,% MCC
IncV3‐ADC 97.4 (96.2–99.9) 91.1 (82.6–96.4) 0.94 (0.88–0.98) 93.1 (87–97) 84.1 (69.9–93.4) 98.6 (92.6–99.9) 0.86
IncV3‐PCT1W 52.6 (35.8–69) 83.5 (73.5–90.9) 0.68 (0.59–0.76) 71.8 (62.7–79.7) 60.6 (42.1–77.1) 76.7 (66.4–85) 0.37
Alex‐ADC 52.6 (35.8–69) 74.6 (63.6–83.8) 0.63 (0.54–0.72) 76.6 (69.6–82.4) 50 (33.8–66.2) 76.6 (65.6–85.5) 0.14
Alex‐PCT1W 18.4 (7.7–34.3) 91.1 (82.6–96.4) 0.55 (0.45–0.64) 67.5 (58.4–75.9) 50 (23–77) 69.9 (60–78.6) 0.42

ROC: receiver operator curve; AUC: area under the curve; MCC: Matthews Correlation Coefficient; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value.