Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 18;145(4):1125–1137. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32186

Table 1.

Pancreatic ductal carcinoma and cancer subtyping signatures and studies used in this study

Technique of discovery Sub‐type Prognosis Composition Therapeutics
Collisson Non‐negative matrix factorization (NMF) analysis with consensus clustering Classical Good N/A Erlotinib
Exocrine Average N/A Non‐proposed
Quasi‐mesenchymal Poor N/A Gemcitabine
Moffitt Non‐negative matrix factorization (NMF) and digital separation Tumour: classical Average (median survival 19 months) N/A N/A
Tumour: basal‐like Poor (median survival 11 months) N/A Better response to adjuvant therapy
Stroma: normal Good (median survival 20 months) Stellate cells N/A
Stroma: activated Poor (median survival 15 months) Macrophages N/A
Bailey Unsupervised clustering Squamous Poor Macrophages N/A
Pancreatic Progenitor N/A N/A N/A
Immunogenic N/A B cells and T cells Checkpoint blockade
ADEX N/A
Sivakumar Master regulator Analysis Notch Good T cell infiltration Immunotherapy
Cell cycle Average N/A Adjuvant therapy
Hedgehog Poor Macrophages N/A