Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 11;45(5):495–512. doi: 10.1111/nan.12528

Table 1.

Demographic, clinical and serological features (n = 101)

Feature Summary statistic
Gender, n (%) M:F 33 (32.7):68 (67.3)
Ethnicity, n (%)
White 72 (71.3)
Black 12 (11.9)
South Asian 8 (7.9)
Other 9 (8.9)
Clinical features, median [interquartile range]
Age at onset (years) 6.1 [3.9–9.3]
Time from disease onset to diagnosis, (months) 2.6 [1.5–7.5]
Time from diagnosis to biopsy, (months) 0.72 [0.39–0.92]
On steroids at biopsy, n (%) 12 (12.2)
CMAS at biopsy 29 [18.75–45]
Reported clinical diagnosis, n (%)
Definite or probable juvenile dermatomyositis 88 (88)
Juvenile dermatomyositis overlap with scleroderma 2 (2)
Juvenile dermatomyositis overlap with polyarthritis 6 (6)
Definite or probable Juvenile polymyositis 2 (2)
Focal myositis 1 (1)
Mixed connective tissue disease 1 (1)
Other idiopathic inflammatory myopathy 1 (1)
Antibody Status, n 90 of 101
Myositis‐specific autoantibodies, n (%) 53 of 90 (58.9)
Anti‐TIF1γ 18 (20.0)
Anti‐NXP‐2 15 (16.7)
Anti‐MDA5 11 (12.2)
Anti‐Mi2 5 (5.6)
Anti‐SRP 2 (2.2)
Anti‐PL7 1 (1.1)
Anti‐SAE 1 (1.1)
Myositis‐associated autoantibodies, n (%) 9 of 90 (10.0)
Anti‐PM‐Scl 6 (6.7)
Anti‐U1RNP 2 (2.2)
Anti‐Scl70 1 (1.1)
No identifiable autoantibodies, n (%) 28 of 90 (31.1)

Autoantibody status data were available in 90 cases. Percentages reflect the number of patients with a given antibody as a proportion of total tested patients.

CMAS, Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale.