Table 1.

Performance summary of LDA versus ACDC, DeepCyTOF, and NMC

	LDACV‐Cells	LDACV‐Samples	ACDCa	DeepCyTOFb	NMC
Accuracy
AML	98.13 ± 0.09	n.a.	98.33 ± 0.02	n.a.	97.34 ± 0.08
			98.30 ± 0.04c
BMMC	95.82 ± 0.10	n.a.	93.20 ± 0.70	n.a.	85.83 ± 0.21
	95.61 ± 0.16d		92.90 ± 0.50c
PANORAMA	97.16 ± 0.07	97.22 ± 0.31	n.r.	n.a.	94.72 ± 0.54
	97.70 ± 0.03d	97.67 ± 0.29d
Multi‐Center	98.51 ± 0.04	98.44 ± 1.66	n.a.	n.r.	98.24 ± 1.86
		98.82 ± 1.73e
Median F1‐score
AML	0.95	n.a.	0.94	n.a.	0.93
			0.93c
BMMC	0.85	n.a.	0.69	n.a.	0.62
	0.85d		0.60c
PANORAMA	0.93	0.93	0.88c	0.59 ± 0.01f	0.89
	0.95d	0.95d
Multi‐Centerb	0.99	0.99	n.a.	0.97 ± 0.01f 0.93c	0.98
		0.98e

n.a.: not available; n.r.: not reported.

^aThe ACDC performance values represent the training performance.

^bWeighted F1‐score.

^cReported values in the original study.

^dClasses considered unknown, similar to ACDC.

^eOnly one sample is training (Sample 2), similar to DeepCyTOF.

^fMean ± SD of 10 different runs.