Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 28.
Published in final edited form as: Org Biomol Chem. 2019 Aug 28;17(34):7995–8000. doi: 10.1039/c9ob01596e

Table 1.

Optimization of reaction conditionsa

graphic file with name nihms-1051786-t0001.jpg
Entry Base Temp. (°C) Yieldb (%)
1c,d 2-Chloropyridine −10 36
2d 2-Chloropyridine −10 56
3 2-Chloropyridine −10 61
4 2-Fluoropyridine −10 45
5 Pentafluoropyridine −10 38
6 2-Methoxypyridine −10 0
7 Pyridine −10 21
8 None −10 34
9 2-Chloropyridine −41 84
10 2-Chloropyridine −78 70
11e 2-Chloropyridine −41 64
12f 2-Chloropyridine −41 85

graphic file with name nihms-1051786-t0002.jpg

a

Conditions: 1 (1.0 mmol), benzylamine (1.1 mmol), benzaldehyde(1.1 mmol), 4 Å mol sieves (1.0 g), CH2Cl2 (10.0 mL), rt, 18 h; then base (1.2 mmol), Tf2O (1.1 mmol), temperature; then rt, 24 h.

b

Isolated yield.

c

4 Å mol sieves were not added.

d

N-Benzylidenebenzylamine (1.1 mmol) was used instead of benzylamine and benzaldehyde.

e

Reflux during final step.

f

48 h for final step.