Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Oct;119(10):1623–1631. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.06.251

Table 3:

Multivariable-adjusted least squares meansa (and standard errors) of body mass index and CAFPAS scores by food security status among college students (n=754)

Total High food security Marginal food security Low food security Very low food security
BMI 24.2 (0.2) 23.5 (0.4) 25.8 (0.5)b 24.7 (0.5) 26.1 (0.5)b
Cooking and food agencyd 15.8 (0.07) 16.4 (0.1) 15.6 (0.2)b 14.9 (0.2)b,c 15.2 (0.2)b
 Food self-efficacy subscale 4.5 (0.04) 4.5 (0.1) 4.2 (0.1)b 4.4 (0.1) 4.4 (0.1)
 Food attitudes subscale 7.5 (0.04) 7.7 (0.1) 7.8 (0.1) 7.2 (0.1)b,c 7.5 (0.1)
 Structure subscale 3.8 (0.04) 4.2 (0.1) 3.6 (0.1)b 3.3 (0.1)b,c 3.3 (0.1)b
a

Adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, degree type, first generation college student, and financial aid

b

Significantly different from high food security

c

Significantly different from marginal food security

d

Measured using the Cooking and Food Provisioning Action Scale (CAFPAS), where a higher score indicates higher cooking and food agency