Table 5.
Comparison of S–O and O–S misattribution biases between subgroups of patients defined according to AVH phenomenology: O-AVH, S-AVH (upper panel). Comparison of IS–ES and ES–IS misattribution biases between subgroups of patients defined according to AVH phenomenology: IS-AVH, ES-AVH (upper panel).
| – | AVH experience | N | Mean | Std. deviation | Std. error mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S–O misattribution bias* | O-AVH | 16 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.06 |
| S-AVH | 8 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.05 | |
| O–S misattribution bias | O-AVH | 16 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.02 |
| S-AVH | 8 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.03 | |
| IS–ES misattribution bias* | ES-AVH | 12 | 0.30 | 0.14 | 0.04 |
| IS-AVH | 11 | 0.20 | 0.09 | 0.02 | |
| ES–IS misattribution bias | ES-AVH | 12 | 0.35 | 0.20 | 0.05 |
| IS-AVH | 11 | 0.34 | 0.15 | 0.04 |
S, Self; O, Other; IS, internal space; ES, external space. *and bold font indicate significance.