Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 25;11:579–590. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S212911

Table 4.

Comparison of the CAPD and APD cost-effectiveness and incremental cost-utility ratio

Item (Disease: Diabetic nephropathy, Age: 60–70 years) APD (Mean±Standard deviation) CAPD (Mean±Standard deviation) Significant difference (p-value)
Number of cases (cases) 9 9
Age (years) 70.1±3.5 70.6±4.2 n. s.
Males (%) 66.7 55.6 n. s.
Dialysis duration (months) 18.6±31.7 18.5±16.5 n. s.
Test values
 Residual Kt/V 0.9±0.5 0.8±0.2 n. s.
 BUN (mg/dL) 44.0±12.7 49.7±13.3 n. s.
 Alb (g/dL) 3.4±0.2 3.0±0.6 n. s.
 P (mg/dL) 4.9±0.9 4.7±1.2 n. s.
 K (mEq/L) 4.3±0.4 4.2±0.5 n. s.
 HDL (mg/dL) 50.6±9.3 69.1±37.2 n. s.
 TG (mg/dL) 96.4±62.9 165.6±124.0 *
Utility
(EQ−5D score, monthly conversion)
0.987±0.039 0.860±0.164 *
Medical costs
(medical department outpatient, US$/month)
4,591±1,494 3,275±1,204 **
Cost-utility analysis
(US$/QALY, annual conversion)
59,830±19,376 49,023±66,773 *
Incremental cost-utility ratio
(ICUR: CAPD vs. APD calculation) 126,034 (12–24 months after intervention: 74,598)
(US$/QALY, annual conversion)

Notes: Welch’s t-test *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, n. s.: not significant.