Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 30;14(9):e0222902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222902

Table 4. Experimental and calculated binding free energies, average binding energies and reorganization free energies of the (-)-stepholidine C3 analogues with and without enclosed hydration corrections.

Compound ΔGexp°a,b Without enclosed hydration model With enclosed hydration model
ΔGcalc°b,c ΔEbb,c ΔGreorg°b,c ΔGcalc°b,c ΔEbb,c ΔGreorg°b,c
1a −10.1 −2.2 −36.9 34.7 −8.8 −42.5 33.7
1b −10.0 −2.3 −38.0 35.7 −10.4 −44.7 34.3
1c −10.0 −1.8 −40.3 38.5 −11.5 −48.1 36.6
1d −10.2 −0.3 −43.7 43.4 −10.6 −55.6 45.0
1e −10.4 −3.9 −39.6 35.7 −12.5 −55.2 42.7
1f −9.6 −3.1 −32.7 29.6 −8.9 −43.2 34.3
RMSEb,d 7.9 1.2
 Correlation coefficient (r) −0.014 0.64

a Experimental affinities are calculated using the relation ΔGexp°=kBTlnKi where Ki is the inhibition constant of binding, kB is the Boltzmann’s constant.

bIn kcal/mol.

cApproximate uncertainties for all measurements are implied by the number of significant figures; the actual values of the uncertainties for each measurement are provided in Table A in S1 File.

dRoot mean square error relative to the experimental binding free energies.