Table 4. Experimental and calculated binding free energies, average binding energies and reorganization free energies of the (-)-stepholidine C3 analogues with and without enclosed hydration corrections.
Compound | a,b | Without enclosed hydration model | With enclosed hydration model | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b,c | ΔEbb,c | b,c | b,c | ΔEbb,c | b,c | ||
1a | −10.1 | −2.2 | −36.9 | 34.7 | −8.8 | −42.5 | 33.7 |
1b | −10.0 | −2.3 | −38.0 | 35.7 | −10.4 | −44.7 | 34.3 |
1c | −10.0 | −1.8 | −40.3 | 38.5 | −11.5 | −48.1 | 36.6 |
1d | −10.2 | −0.3 | −43.7 | 43.4 | −10.6 | −55.6 | 45.0 |
1e | −10.4 | −3.9 | −39.6 | 35.7 | −12.5 | −55.2 | 42.7 |
1f | −9.6 | −3.1 | −32.7 | 29.6 | −8.9 | −43.2 | 34.3 |
RMSEb,d | 7.9 | 1.2 | |||||
Correlation coefficient (r) | −0.014 | 0.64 |
a Experimental affinities are calculated using the relation where Ki is the inhibition constant of binding, kB is the Boltzmann’s constant.
bIn kcal/mol.
cApproximate uncertainties for all measurements are implied by the number of significant figures; the actual values of the uncertainties for each measurement are provided in Table A in S1 File.
dRoot mean square error relative to the experimental binding free energies.