Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2018 Jul 31;17(6):1811–1820. doi: 10.1007/s10237-018-1058-z

Table 1.

Comparison of hemodynamic performance of different membrane shapes (two layers of 100-μm microcells)

Two layers of microcells (D = 100 (μm) Membrane’s tip angle θ Without gap With gap
ΔP (Pa) Area (m2) ΔP (Pa) Escaped blood flow Surface area (gap/membrane)
Cone 22° 94 1.095 × 10−3 - - -
6 Sectors 22° 74 1.238 × 10−3 66 28% 21%
8 Sectors 22° 79 1.171 × 10−3 79 12% 11%
40° 237 0.691 × 10−3 185 24% 10%
60° 455 0.497 × 10−3 293 36% 10%