Table 3.
CYP2D6-opioids |
CYP2C19-PPI |
CYP2D6/CYP2C19-SSRIs |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OneFlorida Primary Care | UF Health Primary Care | UF Health & Moffitt Specialty Clinics | UF Health Specialty Clinics | Nemours Children’s Health Specialty Clinics | UF Health Specialty Clinics | |
Total genotyped | 80 | 235 | 38 | 61 | 30 | 25 |
Test results available to prescriber | Fax | EHR | EHR | EHR | ||
Actionable phenotypes | UM, range (i.e., NM-UM, IM-NM),a IM, PM | UM, RM, IM, PM | UM, PM for CYP2D6 and/or UM, RM, PM for CYP2C19 | |||
General drug therapy recommendations | Switch to non-CYP2D6 mediated opioid (e.g., morphine) or nonopioid analgesic, or if reasonable (and relevant) discontinue CYP2D6 inhibitor | 50–100% Dose increase for UM/ RM25–50% dose decrease for IM/PM | 100% dose increase for UM, 50% dose increase for RM, 50% dose decrease for IM/PM | Avoid SSRI that is metabolized by the CYP enzyme that is actionable; use fluoxetine if actionable phenotype in both CYP2D6/ CYP2C19 | ||
Method for recommendation communication to prescriber | General information sheet | Patientspecific consults provided | Patient-specific consults provided and information sheet | Consults upon requestc and general information sheet | Research coordinator communicated protocol recommendation | Patient-specific consults provided |
Participants with an actionable phenotype,b n (%) | 19 (24) | 104 (44) | 12 (32) | 33 (54) | 15 (50) | 12 (48)d |
Participants with an actionable phenotype who had a medication change that aligned with phenotype, n (%) | 1 (5) | 23 (22) | 2 (17) | 9 (27) | 13 (87) | 11 (100)e |
When genotype results are used typically (for the majority) | Next visit | fOnce resulted | Appointment at week 2 of studyf |
EHR electronic health record, IM intermediate metabolizer, NM normal metabolizer, PM poor metabolizer, PPI proton pump inhibitor, RM rapid metabolizer, SSRI selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, UF University of Florida, UM ultrarapid metabolizer.
When copy-number variation was present, it sometimes resulted as a range phenotype because the copy-number variation could not be detected for specific alleles.
Phenotype accounts for phenoconversion.
Zero consults requested.
Participants only counted once, participants with at least one gene with a phenotype warranting a recommendation.
11 of 11, as one individual had a phenotype that was considered actionable, but did not start an SSRI. Three individuals continued their SSRI that was metabolized by an actionable CYP enzyme, but had dose increases and thus counted as aligning with phenotype.
Appointments were scheduled at week two of the study to allow for genotype results to be acted upon.