Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 7;149(10):1742–1748. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz117

TABLE 3.

Fiber intake at baseline and 6-mo follow-up and changes from baseline for each diet prescription, for adults with overweight or obesity who provided complete dietary recalls1

Diet type n Baseline 6-mo follow-up Change from baseline2 P value3 Effect size4
Low-fat, high-protein5 87 16.6 ± 5.8 20.1 ± 7.6 3.4 ± 7.9a,b 0.0001 0.586
Low-fat, average-protein6 86 17.7 ± 6.9 24.8 ± 9.4 7.0 ± 9.4a <0.0001 1.014
High-fat, average-protein7 89 16.8 ± 5.9 19.0 ± 8.2 2.1 ± 8.1b 0.0141 0.356
High-fat, high-protein8 83 18.6 ± 6.7 20.7 ± 7.2 2.1 ± 6.5b 0.0036 0.3134
1

Values are means ± SDs, n = 345.

2

ANOVA identified a significant difference in change in fiber intake from baseline across diet groups (P < 0.001). Labeled means in a column without a common letter indicate pairwise differences in fiber change from baseline between diet groups after Bonferroni adjustment (P < 0.01).

3

The P values correspond to the difference in means from baseline to 6-mo follow-up.

4

Effect size represents the standardized difference between means from baseline to 6-mo follow-up and was estimated using Cohen's d.

5

Low-fat, high-protein: 20% fat, 25% protein.

6

Low-fat, average-protein: 20% fat, 15% protein.

7

High-fat, average-protein: 40% fat, 15% protein.

8

High-fat, high-protein: 40% fat, 25% protein.