TABLE 3.
Fiber intake at baseline and 6-mo follow-up and changes from baseline for each diet prescription, for adults with overweight or obesity who provided complete dietary recalls1
Diet type | n | Baseline | 6-mo follow-up | Change from baseline2 | P value3 | Effect size4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low-fat, high-protein5 | 87 | 16.6 ± 5.8 | 20.1 ± 7.6 | 3.4 ± 7.9a,b | 0.0001 | 0.586 |
Low-fat, average-protein6 | 86 | 17.7 ± 6.9 | 24.8 ± 9.4 | 7.0 ± 9.4a | <0.0001 | 1.014 |
High-fat, average-protein7 | 89 | 16.8 ± 5.9 | 19.0 ± 8.2 | 2.1 ± 8.1b | 0.0141 | 0.356 |
High-fat, high-protein8 | 83 | 18.6 ± 6.7 | 20.7 ± 7.2 | 2.1 ± 6.5b | 0.0036 | 0.3134 |
Values are means ± SDs, n = 345.
ANOVA identified a significant difference in change in fiber intake from baseline across diet groups (P < 0.001). Labeled means in a column without a common letter indicate pairwise differences in fiber change from baseline between diet groups after Bonferroni adjustment (P < 0.01).
The P values correspond to the difference in means from baseline to 6-mo follow-up.
Effect size represents the standardized difference between means from baseline to 6-mo follow-up and was estimated using Cohen's d.
Low-fat, high-protein: 20% fat, 25% protein.
Low-fat, average-protein: 20% fat, 15% protein.
High-fat, average-protein: 40% fat, 15% protein.
High-fat, high-protein: 40% fat, 25% protein.