Pit 1996.
Methods | Single‐centre Dutch study | |
Participants | 59 men (mean age 72 years) undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate under spinal anaesthesia | |
Interventions | Room temperature irrigation fluid (n = 31): resection time 30 minutes Isothermic irrigation fluid (n = 28): resection time 28 minutes |
|
Outcomes | Rectal temperature, preoperative and postoperative haemoglobin concentrations and subjective participant assessment | |
Notes | No exclusion criteria were described. The data were not useable, as differences between lowest temperature and starting temperature were recorded rather than serial temperature measurements, postoperative haemoglobin rather than estimated blood loss and subjective feeling of cold rather than shivering Volumes irrigated were not stated As a result of the proximity of the rectum and prostate, core temperature measurements at the rectum may be inaccurate |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | 'Randomized selection' |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | 'The patient was not aware of the temperature treatment he had received until the second post‐operative day'; it was not described whether the investigator was blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not described |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not described |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No evidence of this |
Other bias | Low risk | None |