Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 25;2015(2):CD007897. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007897.pub3

Burr 2007.

Methods RCT
Participants Participants aged 3 to 61 who reported symptoms of asthma in the last 12 months and indoor mould in 81 intervention houses (115 persons) and 83 control houses (117 persons) in South Wales
Interventions Removal of all visible mould and fungicide treatment in mould‐damaged houses. A positive input fan was also installed in damaged houses
Outcomes Buildings ‐ Primary: presence of visible indoor mould
Secondary: temperature and humidity
Patients ‐ Primary: variability in peak expiratory flow rate
Secondary: perceived improvement in breathing, reported change in medication use, wheezing and symptoms of rhinitis and rhinoconjunctivitis
Notes The intervention was only partially successful, because by 12 months mould was present in 40% of the intervention houses and 78% of the control houses
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not done
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Probably not done
Unplanned subgroup analyses (16) Low risk No unplanned subgroup analyses
Follow‐up (17) Low risk Follow‐up time 12 months
Compliance (19) Unclear risk "Some members of the control group took their own action to remove mould so that by 12 months it was present in only 78% of control houses"
Valid outcome measures (20) Unclear risk Subjective symptoms and changes in asthma medication
Selection bias (population) (21) Low risk Both participants and controls were recruited from the same population
Selection bias (time) (22) Low risk The questionnaires were sent to both the intervention and control group at the same time
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk The houses were randomised
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Adjustment for confounding (25) Unclear risk Only mean age and number of current smokers were reported
Incomplete outcome data (26) (attrition bias) Low risk The numbers of houses and persons lost to follow‐up were reported