Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 29;11(9):1269. doi: 10.3390/cancers11091269

Table 1.

Comparison of the different studies testing soluble programmed death-ligand 1 (sPD-L1).

Study Patients (n) Time of sPD-L1 Measure sPD-L1 Cut-Off Treatment Main Results
Zhang et al. [19] Advanced NSCLC (109), healthy controls (65) Diagnosis 0.636 ng/mL NS Higher sPD-L1 levels in patients than controls
Shorter OS in high sPD-L1 patients
Okuma et al. [20] Advanced or postsurgical recurrent lung cancer (96) Before initiation of CT or at least 3–4 weeks after last CT 7.32 ng/mL CT Shorter OS in high sPD-L1 patients
Zhao et al. [23] Locally advanced or inoperable NSCLC (126) Diagnosis, Week 2 and 4 of treatment 0.0965 ng/mL TRT ± CT Decrease of sPD-L1 during TRT Shorter OS in high sPD-L1 patients
Okuma et al. [24] Advanced or recurrent NSCLC (39) Baseline 3.357 ng/mL nivolumab Shorter OS TTF in high sPD-L1 patients
Higher rates of CR, PR, and SD in low sPD-L1 patients
Costantini et al. [25] Advanced NSCLC (43) At initial diagnosis, at nivolumab initiation, at first tumor evaluation 0.0337 ng/mL nivolumab sPD-L1 at first tumor evaluation higher in non-responders
Patients with clinical benefit had lower sPD-L1 levels at first tumor evaluation
Patients with increasing sPD-L1 levels had worse ORR, lower rates of clinical benefit, shorter PFS and OS

NSCLC: Non-small cell lung cancer. CT: Chemotherapy. TRT: Thoracic radiotherapy. NS: Not specified.