Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 15;20(18):4574. doi: 10.3390/ijms20184574

Table 4.

Recent developments using machine learning (ML) algorithms in molecular docking.

SF Name ML Algorithm Training Database Best Performance Generic or Family Specific Type of Docking Study Reference
RF-Score RF a PDBbind Rp b = 0.776 Generic BAP c Ballester 2010 [77]
B2BScore RF PDBbind Rp = 0.746 Generic BAP Liu 2013 [192]
SFCScoreRF RF PDBbind Rp = 0.779 Generic BAP Zilian, 2013 [202]
PostDOCK RF Constructed from PDB 92% accuracy Generic VS d Springer, 2005 [181]
- SVM e DUD - Both VS Kinnings, 2011 [175]
ID-Score SVR f PDBbind Rp = 0.85 Generic BAP Li, 2013 [203]
NNScore NN g PDB; MOAD; PDBbind-CN EF = 10.3 Generic VS Durrant, 2010 [79]
CScore NN PDBbind Rp = 0.7668 (gen.) Rp = 0.8237 (fam. spec.) Both BAP Ouyang, 2011 [174]
- Deep NN CSAR, DUD-E ROCAUC = 0.868 Generic VS Ragoza, 2017 [196]
- Deep NN DUD-E ROCAUC = 0.92 Both VS Imrie, 2018 [183]
DLScore Deep NN PDBbind Rp = 0.82 Generic BAP Hassan, 2018 [173]
DeepVS Deep NN DUD ROCAUC = 0.81 Generic VS Pereira, 2016 [177]
Kdeep Deep NN PDBbind Rp = 0.82 Generic BAP Jiménez, 2018 [78]

a Random Forest; b Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient; c Binding Affinity Prediction; d Virtual Screening; e Support Vector Machine; f Support Vector Regression; g Neural Network.