Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 19;9(9):703. doi: 10.3390/ani9090703

Table 5.

Means (M), standard deviations (SD), and t-test results comparing cat owners and non-owners on likelihood of accepting advice on cat care and management from various sources. Cohen’s d (d) effect sizes are also presented. Items were measured on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating a higher likelihood of relying on that source of advice. Items are listed in order of highest to lowest M for owners.

Likelihood of Acting on Advice From: Owners Non-owners t df p D
M SD M SD
Veterinarian 4.65 0.59 4.66 0.98 −0.23 5700 0.817 0.02
RSPCA 4.00 0.89 4.17 0.87 −5.87 1941.5 <0.001 * 0.19
Cat shelter or rescue other than RSPCA (e.g., Cat Protection Society; Lost Dogs Home) 3.85 0.81 3.91 0.84 −2.26 5646 0.024 0.07
Books 3.67 0.78 3.68 0.82 −0.24 5643 0.810 0.01
Zoos Victoria 3.47 1.00 3.61 1.03 −4.45 5638 <0.001 * 0.14
Family 3.41 0.81 3.52 0.81 −4.15 5648 <0.001 * 0.14
General Google search 3.38 0.79 3.39 0.81 −0.35 5652 0.727 0.02
Friends 3.34 0.78 3.47 0.79 −5.11 5648 <0.001 * 0.17
Cat breeder 3.30 1.09 3.44 1.07 −3.89 5645 <0.001 * 0.13
Local council 3.28 0.91 3.64 0.87 −12.54 1967.2 <0.001 * 0.40
Cat fancier association 3.04 0.98 3.02 1.00 0.78 5626 0.435 0.02
Social media 2.84 0.88 2.72 0.89 3.88 1860.9 <0.001 * 0.14
Pet shop 2.71 1.07 2.84 1.05 −3.67 1914.7 <0.001 * 0.12

* Difference is significant at Bonferroni-adjusted alpha level of p < 0.004.