Table 2.
Correlation between genotypic and phenotypic sex in Odontesthes species.
| Species (Population) |
amhy+ (XY/YY) |
Sex Reversal (%) |
amhy– (XX) |
Sex Reversal (%) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | M | F | M | |||
| O. argentinensis | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| O. humensis | 1 | 12 | 1 (7.7) | 2 | 1 | 1 (33.3) |
| O. incisa * | 0 | 6 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| O. mauleanum | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| O. mirinensis | 3 | 9 | 3 (33.3) | 4 | 5 | 5 (55.6) |
| O. nigricans | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 4 (40) |
| O. perugiae (Paraná River pop.) | 0 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| O. piquava * | 0 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| O. regia * | 0 | 5 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 0 |
| O. smitti (Mar del Plata pop.) | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| (Punta Maria pop.) | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
amhy+: samples with amhy amplification; amhy–: samples without amhy amplification. Asterisks (*) after the species name indicate that phenotypic sex ratios differ significantly from 1:1. Pop.: population; F: female; M: male.