Table 1. Mean RT and Accuracy for Stroop Tasks by Condition and Image Type.
Mean and standard deviation of RT and accuracy across subjects. Trials are divided up according their condition and distractor image type for both the spatial word-object Stroop task and emotional word-face Stroop task
| Stroop Task | Condition | Image Type | Mean RT (ms) | Mean Acc (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spatial word – object Stroop task | Congruent | face | 710.09 (86.88) | 96.75 (6.05) |
| house | 711.17 (86.30) | 96.75 (5.45) | ||
| average | 710.63 (84.97) | 96.75 (5.48) | ||
| Incongruent | face | 725.25 (93.98) | 94.75 (6.75) | |
| house | 736.77 (79.62) | 93.32 (5.48) | ||
| average | 731.01 (84.47) | 94.04 (5.39) | ||
| Emotional word-face Stroop task | Congruent | negative | 723.24 (95.30) | 96.61 (4.65) |
| positive | 738.75 (104.10) | 96.61 (4.30) | ||
| average | 731.07 (98.02) | 96.51 (4.06) | ||
| Incongruent | negative | 753.49 (97.66) | 94.86 (6.31) | |
| positive | 762.41 (104.52) | 93.64 (4.76) | ||
| average | 757.96 (99.15) | 94.14 (5.12) |