Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 4.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2019 Jan 4;125:93–108. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.12.006

Table 3: Regions of significant activation in the emotional word-face Stroop task for the group as a whole as determined by a GLM analysis.

All clusters were identified with Threshold Free Cluster Enhancement at 1-p, with p at .95 and family wise error. BA = Brodmann area, Max Z = maximum Z score within the cluster, # of vox = number of voxels within the cluster x, y, z = MNI coordinates of cluster peak

Region BA Max Z # of vox x y z
A. Incongruent & Congruent
Incongruent > Fixation
Inferior Occipital Gyrus(R) BA17 15.3 6248 22 −94 −6
Inferior Occipital Gyrus(L) BA18 16.3 5056 −28 −90 −6
Inferior Frontal Gyrus(R) BA45 6.54 326 46 26 12
Insula(R) BA13 5.74 105 44 20 −2
Precentral Gyrus(L) BA6 5.45 73 −40 6 28
Parahippocampal Gyrus(R) BA27 9.42 50 20 −30 −2
Parahippocampal Gyrus(L) BA27 7.8 22 −20 −30 −6
Middle Frontal Gyrus(R) BA6 4.16 14 50 8 38
Congruent > Fixation
Fusiform Gyrus(R) BA19 16 9926 36 −84 −12
Middle Frontal Gyrus(R) BA 9 5.22 271 40 22 22
Parahippocampal Gyrus(R) BA27 6.93 23 24 −28 −2
Caudate 5.86 15 20 10 0