Table 4: Moderated mediation results for the right DLPFC models across congruent trials.

Three sets of models were run: one without moderators, one with EC as a moderator and one with NA as a moderator. The results for each model are presented separately within the section for each outcome variable. Significant paths, which are those whose p value exceeds the bias-corrected alpha value as determined by boot-strapping, are shown in bold.

Moderated Mediation Results for Congruent Trials – DLPFC Models
Outcome variable	Predictor	path	b	SE	Z	p	a
word	dlpfc	a1	2.03	1.25	1.67	.0956	.006
	dlpfc × EC	a1 × EC	−.59	1.48	−.78	.4325	.006
	dlpfc × NA	a1 × NA	.98	1.80	.51	.6129	.006
face	dlpfc	a2	−3.12	.9	−3.37	.0007	.006
	dlpfc × EC	a2 × EC	.33	1.12	.26	.7957	.006
	dlpfc × NA	a2 × NA	−.28	1.38	−.60	.5517	.006
RT	dlpfc	c	1	.56	1.67	.0946	.006
	dlpfc	c’	.64	.63	1.03	.3015	.006
	dlpfc × EC	c × EC	−.85	.63	−1.48	.1378	.006
	dlpfc × NA	c × NA	−.11	.64	−.23	.8215	.006
	dlpfc × EC	c’ × EC	−.50	.68	−.43	.6700	.006
	dlpfc × NA	c’ × NA	−.57	.71	−.91	.3623	.006
	word	b1	.08	.03	3.11	.0019	.006
	word × EC	b1 × EC	−.02	.04	−.67	.5013	.006
	word × NA	b1 × NA	.04	.06	.73	.4177	.006
	face	b2	0	.03	−.04	.9650	.006
	face × EC	b2 × EC	−.12	.03	−3.41	.0006	.006
	face × NA	b2 × NA	.11	.04	2.49	.0128	.006
Indirect Effects
dlpfc – word – RT		ab1	.1	.07	1.44	.1492	.006
dlpfc – face – RT		ab2	0	.07	−.03	.9780	.006
dlpfc – word – RT × EC		ab1 × EC	−.26	.13	−4.25	<.0001	.006
dlpfc – word – RT × NA		ab1 × NA	.19	.17	1.09	.1301	.006
dlpfc – face – RT × EC		ab2 × EC	.07	.11	.72	.4685	.006
dlpfc – face – RT × NA		ab2 × NA	−.07	.12	−.34	.7346	.006