Table 6. Moderated mediation results for the right DLPFC models across incongruent trials.

Three sets of models were run: one without moderators, one with EC as a moderator and one with NA as a moderator. The results for each model are presented separately within the section for each outcome variable. Significant paths, which are those whose p value exceeds the bias-corrected alpha value as determined by boot-strapping, are shown in bold.

Moderated Mediation Results for Incongruent Trials – DLPFC Models
Outcome variable	Predictor	path	b	SE	Z	p	a
word	dlpfc	a1	4.31	2.97	1.37	.1721	.006
	dlpfc × EC	a1 × EC	−2.22	3.17	−1.06	.2909	.006
	dlpfc × NA	a1 × NA	−1.99	4.89	−.09	.9319	.006
face	dlpfc	a2	−5.02	1.10	−3.68	.0002	.006
	dlpfc × EC	a2 × EC	1.56	1.59	.97	.3306	.006
	dlpfc × NA	a2 × NA	−.82	2.02	−.75	.4536	.006
RT	dlpfc	c	1.92	.063	3.63	.0003	.006
	dlpfc	c’	1.25	.66	2.11	.0346	.006
	dlpfc × EC	c × EC	1.20	1.07	1.01	.3101	.006
	dlpfc × NA	c × NA	−.42	1.30	−.76	.4457	.006
	dlpfc × EC	c’ × EC	1.28	1.12	1.02	.3061	.006
	dlpfc × NA	c’ × NA	−.40	1.42	−.67	.5054	.006
	word	b1	.02	.02	1.59	.1121	.006
	word × EC	b1 × EC	.02	.02	1.31	.1906	.006
	word × NA	b1 × NA	−.04	.02	−2.37	.0176	.006
	face	b2	−.04	.02	−2.13	.0328	.006
	face × EC	b2 × EC	.03	.02	1.42	.1551	.006
	face × NA	b2 × NA	−.05	.03	−1.86	.0634	.006
Indirect Effects
dlpfc – word – RT		ab1	.13	.1	1.35	.1786	.006
dlpfc – face – RT		ab2	.04	.07	.56	.5739	.006
dlpfc – word – RT × EC		ab1 × EC	−.05	.16	−.63	.5255	.006
dlpfc – word – RT × NA		ab1 × NA	−.01	.2	−.3	.7627	.006
dlpfc – face – RT × EC		ab2 × EC	−.1	.11	−.65	.5183	.006
dlpfc – face – RT × NA		ab2 × NA	.13	.14	1.40	.1628	.006