Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 21;9(22):6485–6500. doi: 10.7150/thno.34429

Table 1.

Physicochemical characterization of the NPs

Loading capacity (% w/w)
Samples Diameter ζ Potential (mV) PDI NIR Dox pIC R848 MIP3α
NP(NIR)-PEG
Denoted as NP(empty)
187.4 ± 44.7 -13.9 ± 6.2 0.064 63.6 ± 1.4 - - - -
NP(NIR+dox)-PEG
Denoted as NP(dox)
185.9 ± 28.2 -13.5 ± 7.5 0.127 64.9 ± 0.9 13,9 ± 1.8 - - -
NP(NIR+pIC+R848+MIP3α)-PEG
Denoted as NP(pIC+R848+MIP3α)
177.3 ± 86.6 -14.3 ± 4.9 0.120 61.1 ± 7.8 - 47.7 ± 2.6 58.4 ± 3.2 63.8 ± 5.0
NP(NIR+dox+pIC+R848+MIP3α)-PEG
Denoted as NP(dox+pIC+R848+MIP3α)
177.3 ± 86.8 -14.3 ± 4.9 0.120 62.8 ± 5.6 6.3 ± 1.1 37.9 ± 10.1 17.1 ± 3.8 63.9 ± 3.8

Physicochemical characterization of the PLGA-PEG NPs containing dox and/or different immune adjuvants. The PLGA NPs were characterized by dynamic light scattering and zeta potential measurements. PLGA NPs size and zeta potential data represent the mean value ± SD of 10 readings of one representative batch. The loading capacity of dox and NIR dye was measured by fluorescence method. The loading capacity of pIC, R848 and MIP3α was determined by RP-HPLC analysis. The loading capacity data represent the average value ± SD of batch variation.