Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 21;9(22):6468–6484. doi: 10.7150/thno.35383

Table 1.

Comparison of clinicopathological profiles between low and high BCAP31 expression in BC patients. (n = 186 patients)*

BCAP31 expression
High (N = 87) Low (N = 99)
Clinical Valuable No. of
patients
% No. of
patients
% p Value
Age (years), median (range)a 50 (33-76) 51 (32-80) 0.9849
Age, yearsb
≤50 44 50.57 49 49.49 0.8832
>50 43 49.43 50 50.51
Gradeb
High 2 2.30 2 2.02 0.8607
Intermediate 54 62.07 58 58.59
Low 20 22.99 22 22.22
Unknown 11 12.64 17 17.17
pTNM stageb#
I 19 21.84 39 37.37 0.0756
II 50 57.47 48 48.48
III 18 20.69 13 13.13
NA 0 0.00 1 0.54
Tumor size (cm)b
≤2 36 41.38 49 48.48 0.3698
2~5 46 52.87 43 43.43
>5 5 5.75 6 6.06
Unknown 0 0.00 2 2.02
LN statusb
Negative 50 57.47 64 64.65 0.3534
Positive 37 42.53 34 34.34
Unknown 0 0.00 1 1.01
Molecular subtypeb
Luminal A 11 12.64 30 30.30 0.0000
Luminal B 14 16.09 29 29.29
HER2+ 5 5.75 20 20.20
TNBC 57 65.52 20 20.20

* LN, lymph node; TNBC, triple negative breast cancer; pTNM, pathologic tumor, lymph node, metastasis classification.

# pTNM stage IV was not included in this cohort of patients.

a Student's t test.

b P values based on Pearson's Chi-square test for categorical (counts, percentage) variables.