Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Urol. 2015 Sep;25(5):441–448. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000208

Table 2.

Selected publications on imaging for staging of lymph node metastases in muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer

Lymph nodes
Modality Author/date [refs] n Accuracy
%
Overstaging
%
Understaging
%
Sensitivity % Specificity % Comments

CT Tritschler (2012) [6] 276 54 8.3 29.4 NR NR
FDG PET/CT Jeong (2015) [14] 61 NR PET/CT 3.3 CT 6.6 PET/CT 26.2 CT 21.3 PET/CT 47.1 CT 29.4 PET/CT 93.2 CT 97.7
[11C] Choline PET-/CT Brunocilla (2014) [15] 26 NR NR NR PET/CT 42 CT 14 PET/CT 84 CT 89 Patient-based analysis
[18F] FDG PET-CT cf CT & PET Goodfellow (2014) [16] 233 PET 82 CT 83 PET + CT 87 NR NR PET 46 CT 46 PET/CT 69 PET 97 CT 98 PET/CT 95
FDG PET/CT Hitier-Berthault (2013) [17] 52 PET/CT 65.4 CT 55.7 NR NR PET/CT 36.4 CT 9.1 PET/CT 86.7 CT 90
[11C] Choline PET-/CT Maurer (2011) [18] 44 PET/CT 91 CT 90 NR NR PET/CT 28 CT 39 PET/CT 95 CT 92 Identification of involved lymph nodes
FDG PET/CT Lodde (2010) [9] 44 NR NR NR PET/CT 57 CT 33 PET/CT 100 CT 100
FDG PET/CT Swinnen (2010) [19] 51 PET/CT 84 CT 80 NR NR PET/CT 46 CT 46 PET/CT 97 CT 92
[11C] Choline PET-CT Ceci (2015) [20] 59 81 NR NR 59 90
MRI (DW and USPIO) Birkhauser (2013) [21] 75 NR NR NR 65–75 93–96
MRI (DW & USPIO) Thoeny (2009) [22] 21 90 NR NR 80 73
MRI (DGE) Daneshmand (2012) [23] 122 80.3 NR NR 40.7 91.5
MRI (DW) Papalia (2011) [24] 36 NR NR NR 76.4 89.4