Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 11;58(37):13030–13034. doi: 10.1002/anie.201906462

Table 1.

Optimization of the reaction conditions.[a] Inline graphic

Entry Catalyst R t [min][b] Yield [%][c]
1[d,e] FeCl2⋅4 H2O n‐propyl (2 a) 20 76 (3 aa)
2[d–f] FeCl2⋅4 H2O n‐propyl (2 a) 20 5 (3 aa)
3[d] FeCl2⋅4 H2O n‐propyl (2 a) 20 84 (3 aa)
4[d] FeF3 n‐propyl (2 a) 20 45 (3 aa)
5[d] FeCl3 n‐propyl (2 a) 20 73 (3 aa)
6[d] Fe(acac)3 n‐propyl (2 a) 20 89 (3 aa)
7 Fe(acac)3 n‐propyl (2 a) 15 98 (3 aa)
8 n‐propyl (2 a) 15 0 (3 aa)
9[g] Fe(acac)3 n‐propyl (2 a) 15 0 (3 aa)
10[f] Fe(acac)3 n‐propyl (2 a) 15 11 (3 aa)
11 Fe(acac)3 cyclohexyl (2 b) 5 96 (3 ab)

[a] Reaction conditions: Feed 1: chlorobenzene (1 a; 2 mmol), Fe(acac)3 (0.04 mmol), THF (5 mL); feed 2: Grignard reagent (3 mmol), SIPr⋅HCl (0.08 mmol), THF, 25 °C, 24 W blue LEDs. [b] Residence time. [c] The yield was determined by GC. [d] Fe(acac)3 (0.02 mmol), SIPr⋅HCl (0.04 mmol), [e] T=20 °C. [f] No light. [g] No ligand.