Table 1.
Quinoa | Canihua | Amaranth | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameters | Raw | Fermented | Raw | Fermented | Raw | Fermented |
Moisture (g kg−1)2 | 93.0 ± 3.0a | 90.6 ± 3.9a | 106 ± 5.2b | 67.0 ± 6.2a | 104 ± 3.5b | 55.0 ± 2.7a |
pH | 6.20 ± 0.08b | 3.82 ± 0.11a | 6.27 ± 0.04b | 3.90 ± 0.02a | 6.42 ± 0.12b | 3.86 ± 0.04a |
Lactic acid (g kg−1) | 14.1 ± 0.28a | 75.2 ± 3.6b | 16.3 ± 0.58a | 80.4 ± 1.2b | 6.20 ± 0.08a | 63.9 ± 1.8b |
Iron (mg kg−1) | 50.8 ± 1.3a | 49.7 ± 4.1a | 117 ± 3.4a | 112 ± 3.2a | 70.0 ± 1.7a | 67.2 ± 1.7a |
Zinc (mg kg−1) | 41.4 ± 0.40a | 40.2 ± 1.4a | 45.2 ± 0.60a | 42.3 ± 1.5a | 41.2 ± 0.49a | 39.2 ± 3.4a |
Calcium (mg kg−1) | 0.63 ± 0.02a | 0.70 ± 0.13a | 1.57 ± 0.04a | 1.58 ± 0.14a | 1.52 ± 2.1a | 1.43 ± 1.6a |
Phytate (g kg−1) | 8.80 ± 0.27b | 2.24 ± 0.25a | 9.21 ± 0.99b | 2.20 ± 0.08a | 11.9 ± 0.43b | 6.44 ± 0.33a |
Phytate degradation (%) | — | 74.0 | — | 76.2 | — | 47.2 |
Molar ratios 3 | ||||||
Phy:Fe | 14.6 ± 0.62b | 3.90 ± 0.77a | 6.66 ± 0.71b | 1.66 ± 0.06a | 12.2 ± 0.87b | 8.12 ± 0.54a |
Phy:Zn | 20.9 ± 1.1b | 5.55 ± 0.80a | 17.8 ± 2.9b | 6.32 ± 0.36a | 27.5 ± 1.8b | 18.3 ± 2.5a |
Phy:Ca | 0.82 ± 0.04b | 0.20 ± 0.06a | 0.33 ± 0.05b | 0.09 ± 0.01a | 0.51 ± 0.07b | 0.28 ± 0.03a |
Phy·Ca:Zn | 332 ± 18b | 94.9 ± 18a | 699 ± 125b | 249 ± 26a | 1005 ± 136b | 641 ± 121a |
Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation (n=6). Bivariate analysis was conducted for each pseudocereal (raw and fermented), different letters indicate significant differences in the parameters at P < 0.05.
Moisture content was determined for the fermented flours, which were dried at 60 °C for 4 h. The differences in the moisture content of the fermented samples (quinoa, canihua and amaranth) may be due to the fact that, during the drying process (60 °C for 4 h), the amount of wet suspension that was placed on the trays was not weighed.