Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 5;99(11):5239–5248. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9793

Table 1.

Effect of lactic acid fermentation with Lp299v® on pH, lactic acid, mineral, and phytate content and molar ratios of quinoa, canihua, and amaranth flour.1 All concentrations are expressed in dry matter

Quinoa Canihua Amaranth
Parameters Raw Fermented Raw Fermented Raw Fermented
Moisture (g kg−1)2 93.0 ± 3.0a 90.6 ± 3.9a 106 ± 5.2b 67.0 ± 6.2a 104 ± 3.5b 55.0 ± 2.7a
pH 6.20 ± 0.08b 3.82 ± 0.11a 6.27 ± 0.04b 3.90 ± 0.02a 6.42 ± 0.12b 3.86 ± 0.04a
Lactic acid (g kg−1) 14.1 ± 0.28a 75.2 ± 3.6b 16.3 ± 0.58a 80.4 ± 1.2b 6.20 ± 0.08a 63.9 ± 1.8b
Iron (mg kg−1) 50.8 ± 1.3a 49.7 ± 4.1a 117 ± 3.4a 112 ± 3.2a 70.0 ± 1.7a 67.2 ± 1.7a
Zinc (mg kg−1) 41.4 ± 0.40a 40.2 ± 1.4a 45.2 ± 0.60a 42.3 ± 1.5a 41.2 ± 0.49a 39.2 ± 3.4a
Calcium (mg kg−1) 0.63 ± 0.02a 0.70 ± 0.13a 1.57 ± 0.04a 1.58 ± 0.14a 1.52 ± 2.1a 1.43 ± 1.6a
Phytate (g kg−1) 8.80 ± 0.27b 2.24 ± 0.25a 9.21 ± 0.99b 2.20 ± 0.08a 11.9 ± 0.43b 6.44 ± 0.33a
Phytate degradation (%) 74.0 76.2 47.2
Molar ratios 3
Phy:Fe 14.6 ± 0.62b 3.90 ± 0.77a 6.66 ± 0.71b 1.66 ± 0.06a 12.2 ± 0.87b 8.12 ± 0.54a
Phy:Zn 20.9 ± 1.1b 5.55 ± 0.80a 17.8 ± 2.9b 6.32 ± 0.36a 27.5 ± 1.8b 18.3 ± 2.5a
Phy:Ca 0.82 ± 0.04b 0.20 ± 0.06a 0.33 ± 0.05b 0.09 ± 0.01a 0.51 ± 0.07b 0.28 ± 0.03a
Phy·Ca:Zn 332 ± 18b 94.9 ± 18a 699 ± 125b 249 ± 26a 1005 ± 136b 641 ± 121a
1

Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation (n=6). Bivariate analysis was conducted for each pseudocereal (raw and fermented), different letters indicate significant differences in the parameters at P < 0.05.

2

Moisture content was determined for the fermented flours, which were dried at 60 °C for 4 h. The differences in the moisture content of the fermented samples (quinoa, canihua and amaranth) may be due to the fact that, during the drying process (60 °C for 4 h), the amount of wet suspension that was placed on the trays was not weighed.

3

Molar ratios were calculated with the phytate and mineral contents and molecular weights (see, Eqns 2, 3, 4, 5).