Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 3;114(10):1726–1737. doi: 10.1111/add.14642

Table 3.

Univariate meta‐regression of study and patient characteristics on prevalence of alcohol dependence in non‐selective patients in the UK hospital system.

Alcohol dependence in non‐selective patients Prevalence estimates (n) Patients (n) Prevalence LCI UCI τ 2 I 2 (%)
23 992 784 10.25 7.06 13.96 0.070 99.75
Prevalence estimates (n) Patients (n) Beta LCI UCI τ 2 I 2 (%) P‐value a Adjusted R 2 (%)
Is the study a conference abstract? (binary) 23 992 784 −1.39 −11.80 9.03 0.004 96.21 0.79 0
Is the alcohol diagnosis diagnostic assessment robust? (binary) 23 993 784 −1.09 −9.30 7.13 0.004 95.22 0.79 0
Mean age of patients (continuous) 7 7496 −0.80 −1.36 −0.24 0.000 0.00 0.02 100.00
Proportion female (continuous) 10 8588 0.03 −0.29 3.50 0.002 46.80 0.83 0
Total Newcastle–Ottawa scale quality score (continuous) 23 992 784 0.31 −2.14 2.77 0.004 95.00 0.79 0
Year study conducted in (continuous) 16 986 504 0.45 −1.10 2.01 0.004 94.59 0.54 0
Type of setting patients admitted to (categorical) 23 992 784 0.001 64.09 0.009 60.84
Nation study conducted in (categorical) 23 992 784 0.004 95.38 0.40 2.01
a

Result from t‐test where the null hypothesis was no linear relationship between prevalence and each explanatory variable. LCI = lower confidence interval; UCI = upper confidence interval; τ2 = between‐study variance; adjusted R 2 = percentage of variation in prevalence explained by a particular covariate