Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 1;14(10):e0222772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222772

Table 6. Poole results for the associations between MGMT promoter hypermethylation and clincopathological features of CC.

Clincopathological features Studies (N) Patients (N) Heterogeneity Modela Effect size
I2(%) PQ-test OR (95% CI) P
Histological types (SCC vs. AdC) 8 475 0 0.73 F 0.73(0.43–1.26) 0.26
FIGO stage (I+II vs. III+IV) 9 560 0 0.43 F 2.81(1.79–4.41) <0.001
Histological grade(G3 vs. G1+G2) 7 433 54 0.04 R 1.15(0.49–2.68) 0.74
HPV infection(Positive vs. Negative) 2 850 96 <0.001 R 17.24(0.02–190.55) 0.43
Therapeutic response (Yes vs. No) 2 206 0 0.85 F 1.65(0.80–3.38) 0.17
Age at diagnoses (<50 vs. ≥50) 2 720 0 0.98 F 1.40(0.93–2.10) 0.11
Lymph node metastasis (Yes vs. No) 2 66 1 0.32 R 4.91(1.56–15.42) 0.007

Abbreviations: N, number; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; AdC, adenocinoma; F, fixed-effects model; R, random-effects model.

Notes

aWhen significant heterogeneity was found (I2≥50% or PQ-test≤0.1), a random-effects model with the inverse variance method was used to pool the results; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was applied.