Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 19;28(8):1143–1151. doi: 10.1002/pds.4810

Table 3.

Evaluation of NLP application using development dataset

Development Dataset (KPNW) N = 1006
NLP‐only Classification na Performance Compared with Gold Standard Chart Review na = 627
Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI)
Event type, irrespective of substance involved Intentional overdose 74 .81 (.70‐.89) .98 (.96‐.99) .83 (.72‐.91) .97 (.96‐.99)
Unintentional overdose 158 .71 (.63‐.78) .94 (.91‐.96) .79 (.71‐.85) .91 (.87‐.93)
Overdose of any type 232 .80 (.74‐.85) .93 (.90‐.95) .87 (.81‐.91) .89 (.85‐.92)
Adverse drug reaction—ADR 79 .24 (.15‐.35) .93 (.90‐.95) .32 (.21‐.45) .89 (.87‐.92)
Substance involved in overdose or ADR Heroin 19 .84 (.60‐.96) 1.0 (.99‐1.0) .80 (.56‐.93) 1.0 (.99‐1.0)
Opioid only (excludes heroin) 98 .37 (.27‐.47) .94 (.92‐.95) .39 (.29‐.50) .93 (.91‐.95)
Polysubstance including opioid (excludes heroin) 175 .57 (.49‐.64) .96 (.94‐.97) .75 (.67‐.82) .91 (.89‐.93)
Any opioid (excludes heroin, includes polysubstance) 273 .72 (.66‐.77) .96 (.94‐.97) .88 (.83‐.92) .90 (.87‐.92)
Substance abuse involved in opioid‐related overdose Prescription med abuse (whether prescribed or not) 56 .38 (.25‐.51) .96 (.94‐.98) .50 (.34‐.66) .94 (.92‐.96)
Substance abuse (including alcohol abuse or presence) 45 .62 (.47‐.76) .97 (.95‐.98) .58 (.43‐.72) .97 (.95‐.98)
Illicit drug abuse 84 .46 (.36‐.58) .97 (.97‐.98) .68 (.55‐.80) .92 (.90‐.94)
Any substance abuse 129 .67 (.59‐.75) .96 (.94‐.97) .81 (.72‐.87) .92 (.89‐.94)
Patient error in opioid‐related overdose or ADR Patient error 21 .33 (.15‐.57) .98 (.96‐.99) .33 (.15‐.57) .98 (.96‐.99)

Abbreviations: KPNW, Kaiser Permanente Northwest; NLP, natural language processing; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.

a

n is the count as determined by gold standard chart review, includes only events for which EHR source data were available.