Skip to main content
. 2000 Jan 15;20(2):617–625. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-02-00617.2000

Table 3.

Behavioral states in recovery

W SWS PS PS/SWS
REC1 6 hr L dbp+/+ 32.6 (3.4)a 54.0 (3.0) 13.3 (0.7)a 25.0 (1.6)a
dbp−/− 45.4 (3.1) 44.8 (2.8) 9.8 (0.9) 22.4 (2.5)
p 0.015 0.042 0.008 0.37
12 hr D dbp+/+ 70.8 (4.2)b 24.9 (4.0)b 4.2 (0.5)a 19.7 (3.1)a
dbp−/− 69.1 (1.0) 26.1 (0.7) 4.8 (0.7)b 18.5 (2.6)b
p 0.69 0.78 0.50 0.78
REC2 12 hr L dbp+/+ 47.8 (2.3) 41.5 (2.7) 10.7 (0.7) 27.0 (3.2)
dbp−/− 56.1 (4.3)b 34.3 (4.1)a 7.7 (1.2) 22.9 (3.7)b
p 0.11 0.17 0.044 0.41
12 hr D dbp+/+ 76.5 (2.6) 19.8 (2.5) 3.6 (0.2)b 19.9 (2.2)b
dbp−/− 71.4 (1.1) 23.7 (1.1) 4.9 (0.7)a 21.1 (3.3)a
p 0.09 0.17 0.09 0.77

Mean ± SEM percentage (n = 8 per genotype) recording time for W, SWS, and PS and the percentage PS/SWS for the light (L) and dark (D) periods for REC1 and REC2. Variables were affected by genotype and/or sleep deprivation (two-way ANOVA; REC1 light∶factor genotype: W, SWS, PS, p < 0.05; factor SD: W, PS, PS/SWS, p < 0.005 and SWS,p < 0.05; interaction: PS, p < 0.07; REC1 dark: factor SD: PS, PS/SWS, p < 0.001 and W,p < 0.05; REC2 light: factor SD: W, SWS, PS/SWS,p < 0.01; REC2 dark:factor SD:PS, PS/SWS,p < 0.005). p indicates the probability of the t tests comparing the genotypes.

ap < 0.005, bp < 0.05, significant difference from the second baseline day (Table 1); pairedt test.