Skip to main content
. 2000 May 1;20(9):3469–3486. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-09-03469.2000

Fig. 14.

Fig. 14.

The frequency dependence of ITD tuning in individual dorsoventral electrode penetrations through the ICCls in normal (A–C) and device-reared (D–F) owls. A, Best ITD as a function of best frequency at individual recording sites. Each line represents data from sites in a single dorsoventral penetration. Crosses represent data from Figure 12. B, For each line shown inA, the range of best ITDs plotted with respect to the range of best frequencies. C, The difference between the mean best ITD from sites tuned to between 3 and 4.5 kHz and the best ITD measured at a site along the same electrode penetration with the given best frequency, binned as indicated. Thick lines,boxes, and bars indicate medians, quartiles, and 10th/90th percentiles, respectively.E–F, Data from device-reared owls, plotted as described for A–C, respectively. D, Crosses represent data from Figure 13. F, The data for each frequency did not differ significantly from the corresponding data in C(Mann–Whitney U test, p > 0.05).