Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 24;9(9):e025304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025304

Table 2.

Percentage of respondents reporting a factor in their top 10, sum of points assigned and mean rank within category

Factors leading to good outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery Percentage in top 10
n=34, %
Assigned points (minimum–maximum) n=31 Mean rank (SD) n=27–24
Preoperative n=27
 Preoperative screening of patients for malnutrition, followed by dietary measures* 57 150 (2–20) 3.07 (SD 1.639)
 Preoperative screening of elderly by a geriatrician 35 61 (3–10) 4.7 (SD 2.072)
 Preoperative visit of the patient to an anaesthesiologists 32 63 (3–15) 4.33 (SD 2.572)
 Preoperative opportunity to discuss a complex patient in a preoperative discussion with an intensivist or anaesthesiologist 29 93 (5–20) 4.59 (SD 3.067)
 Preoperative counselling patients to quit smoking 19 55 (5–20) 5.19 (SD 2.760)
 Preoperative pulmonary training 19 53 (0–20) 4.37 (SD 1.757)
 The surgeon visits the patient the day before the surgery, or has seen the patient at the preoperative consultation 8 20 (10–10) 5.63 (SD 2.871)
 Preoperative visit of patients to a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic 3 7 (7–7) 6.52 (SD 2.190)
 The anaesthesiologist that performs the anaesthesia visits the patient the day before the surgery, or sees the patient at the preoperative consultation 3 0 6.59 (SD 2.258)
Intraoperative, elective n=26
 Elective surgery is performed by surgeons with a specialisation in gastrointestinal oncology* 87 358 (5–50) 1.42 (SD 0.987)
 A hypovolemic situation during the surgery is actively avoided 32 90 (5–20) 3.73 (SD 1.756)
 The ratio between laparoscopy and laparotomy in an elective setting 16 37 (2–20) 4.69 (SD 2.035)
 The percentage of patients with elective surgery that receive a definite ostomy 14 35 (5–15) 4.04 (SD 1.708)
 The percentage of patients with elective surgery that receive a diverting ostomy in addition to the anastomosis 8 25 (5–20) 3.77 (SD 1.751)
 The percentage of patients with laparoscopic surgery that has to be converted to laparotomy 5 0 4.85 (SD 1.515)
 The percentage of patients that receive epidural anaesthetics 5 0 5.5 (SD 1.421)
Intraoperative, emergency/urgent n=26
 Emergency or urgent surgery is performed by surgeons with specialisation in gastrointestinal oncology* 60 235 (5–20) 1.31 (SD 0.549)
 The percentage of patient that receive an anastomosis in emergency or urgent surgery 22 65 (5–20) 1.88 (SD 0.516)
 De ratio between laparoscopy and laparotomy surgery in emergency or urgent setting 5 10 (5–5) 2.81 (SD 0.567)
Postoperative n=24
 Presence of a protocol for early recognition of anastomotic leakage* 54 175 (5–20) 2.96 (SD 1.628)
 Accessibility of a surgeon specialised in gastrointestinal oncology to also review a patient, during business hours (beyond ward rounds)* 41 108 (5–15) 2.79 (SD 1.062)
 Daily ward rounds by the surgeon that performed the surgery or another surgeon specialised in gastrointestinal oncology* 38 123 (5–20) 2.08 (SD 1.472)
 Patients are postoperative admitted on a ward specialised on gastrointestinal and oncological surgery 32 90 (5–20) 3.71 (SD 1.517)
 Presence of a protocol for testing CRP and consequences according to outcomes 22 80 (5–20) 4.21 (SD 1.414)
 Presence of a case manager who contacts the patient after hospitalisation 3 0 5.25 (SD 1.152)
Complications/reinterventions n=24
 Reoperation is performed by surgeons with a specialisation in gastrointestinal oncology* 62 185 (2–20) 1.71 (SD 0.999)
 Time elapsed between first symptoms of a complication and a re-intervention* 49 210 (5–25) 1.62 (SD 0.576)
 No of reinterventions per patient with a serious complication 5 10 (10–10) 3.08 (SD 0.776)
 The ratio between radiological and surgical reintervention 3 10 (10–10) 3.58 (SD 0.504)
Evening, night and weekend shifts n=24
 24/7 a surgeon specialised in gastrointestinal oncology is ‘on call’ (he/she does not have to be in the hospital, though is available for consultation)* 65 170 (5–15) 1.83 (SD 1.167)
 A surgeon specialised in gastrointestinal oncology is present at ward rounds in weekends 14 18 (0–8) 2.96 (SD 1.628)
 Surgeon ‘on call’ is present at the evening report 11 20 (10–10) 3.58 (SD 1.558)
 The emergency room is 24/7 accessible 8 10 (10–10) 3.08 (SD 1.283)
 Presence of a surgeon in the hospital 24/7 3 10 (10–10) 4.92 (SD 1.349)
 Presence of a resident in the hospital 24/7 0 0 4.63 (SD 1.245)
Communication n=24
 Communication between nurses and interns, residents or surgeons 30 63 (3–12) 1.54 (SD 0.779)
 Communication between surgeons 24 45 (5–10) 2.13 (SD 0.741)
 At least monthly discussion of outcomes (including discussion of complications) 19 55 (5–15) 3.46 (SD 0.932)
 Communication between surgeon and anaesthesiologist 8 15 (5–10) 2.88 (SD 0.992)
Healthcare providers n=24
 Average experience of nurses on the wards 30 70 (2–20) 1.75 (SD 0.737)
 Average experience of interns and residents responsible for the wards 11 18 (8–10) 2.63 (SD 1.173)
 The hospital is a referral centre for colorectal surgery 5 5 (5–5) 2.75 (SD 1.073)
 No of nurses per patient (nurse/patient ratio) 5 5 (5–5) 2.88 (SD 1.154)
 No of surgeons specialised in gastrointestinal oncology in a hospital 5 10 (10–10) 4.29 (SD 1.628)
Hospital structure n=24
 No of colorectal surgeries (both benign and malignant) performed in the hospital annually* 46 103 (2–20) 2.42 (SD 1.586)
 Presence of emergency intervention team 24 53 (2–15) 2.54 (SD 1.668)
 Accessibility of an intervention radiologist 19 35 (5–10) 4.17 (SD 1.633)
 The ICU level of the hospital 11 30 (5–20) 4.08 (SD 1.381)
 The operating team also performs other high-complex surgeries 8 17 (2–10) 3.5 (SD 1.445)

*Ten most important factors are marked with.

CRP, C reactive protein; ICU, intensive care unit.