Table 1.
Establishment of the Working Group | Generation of the initial checklist | Optimisation of the checklist | Approval of the final checklist | ||||||
Initial assessment of adapted guidelines | Semistructured interviews | Delphi consensus survey | External review by guideline developers | External review by guideline users | Final assessment of adapted guidelines | ||||
Main objective | To identify individuals who are relevant to participate in the project | To develop the initial version of the checklist | To assess the adequacy of each item of the checklist | To explore current practices in adaptation of guidelines | To define the list of items to be included in the checklist | To assess the usefulness of each item of the checklist | To assess the usefulness of each item of the checklist | To assess the adequacy of each item of the checklist | To approve the final version of the checklist |
Study design | – | – | Methodological survey of adapted guidelines | Semistructured interviews | Delphi consensus survey | Survey | Semistructured interviews | Methodological survey of adapted guidelines | – |
Participants |
|
|
Coordination Team (two reviewers) | Guideline developers | Delphi Panel Members | Guideline developers | Guideline users | Coordination Team (two reviewers) |
|
Main outcome | – | – | Applicability rating of each item of the checklist | Participants’ views and experiences with process for adapting guidelines | Items considered relevant to report the adaptation of guidelines | Usefulness rating of each item of the checklist | Participants’ views and experiences with the checklist | Applicability rating of each item of the checklist | – |
Study size | Convenience sample | – | Convenience sample of 10 adapted guidelines | Sampling saturation | 20–30 participants from GIN Adaptation Guidelines Working Group, WHO and authors of adapted guidelines | GIN community | Sampling saturation | Convenience sample of 10 adapted guidelines | – |
GIN, Guidelines International Network.