Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 15;15(9):2106–2111. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1581526

Table 1.

Analyses for risk factors for mumps infection during an outbreak in Lu’an, China, 2016–2017.

Variables No. of students c n (%) mumps cases Univariable OR
(95% CI)
Multivariable OR
(95% CI)
Gender        
 Male 555 61(11.0) 1.7(1.1–2.7) a 1.5(0.9–2.3)
 Female 540 36(6.7) Ref.  
Birth cohort        
 2000–2007 (Before EPI e) 479 40(8.4) 0.9(0.6–1.4) NA
 2008–2011 (After EPI) 616 57(9.3) Ref.  
Time interval since last MuCV immunization d (years)      
 <5 134 4(3.0) 0.1(0.04–0.4) b 0.1(0.03–0.3) b
 5- 631 49(7.8) 0.3(0.2–0.6) b 0.3(0.2–0.5) b
 10- 123 15(12.2) 0.5(0.3–1.1) 0.5(0.2–1.09)
 Unvaccinated 103 21(20.4) Ref.  
Taking school bus to school        
 Yes 389 56(14.4) 2.7(1.8–4.2) b 2.3(1.4–3.7) b
 No 706 41(5.8) Ref.  
Resident student        
 Yes 43 2(4.7) 0.5(0.1–2.1) NA
 No 1052 95(9.0) Ref.  
Principal residence        
 Z township 373 48(12.9) 2.2(1.4–3.4) b 1.5(0.9–2.4)
 Other townships 722 49(6.8) Ref.  

a p < 0.05

b p < 0.01

c 45 students with previous mumps infection were excluded from the study.

d 104 students without clear immunization history were excluded.

e EPI: Expanded Program on Immunization