Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Nutr. 2018 Jul 30;120(5):557–566. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518001708

Table 2. Hierarchical regression for the associations between maternal factors and neonatal weight to length ratio (n=393).

WEIGHT TO LENGTH RATIO (kg/m)

Independent Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
B 95% CI P-valueb β 95% CI P-valueb β 95% CI P-valueb
Neonate sex
    Male Ref Ref Ref
    Female -0.02 -0.17; 0.13 0.769 -0.05 -0.19; 0.10 0.533 -0.06 -0.20; 0.08 0.396
Maternal dietary pattern
    Traditional pattern score -0.04 -0.08; 0.00 0.078 -0.04 -0.08; 0.00 0.081 -0.04 -0.08; -0.00 0.033
HIV/treatment status
    HIV negative Ref Ref
    HIV-positive (antenatal ART) 0.07 -0.11; 0.25 0.422 0.07 -0.10; 0.24 0.436
    HIV-positive (pre-pregnancy ART) 0.01 -0.23; 0.26 0.906 -0.02 -0.26; 0.21 0.833
BMI category
    Normal weight Ref Ref
    Overweight 0.09 -0.09; 0.26 0.343 0.09 -0.08; 0.26 0.301
    Obese 0.27 0.08; 0.46 0.005 0.25 0.07; 0.43 0.008
Gestational weight gain
    Rate, kg/week 0.36 0.05; 0.67 0.024 0.48 0.18; 0.78 0.002
Parity
    Para 0 Ref
    Para 1 0.33 0.15; 0.50 <0.001
    Para ≥2 0.32 0.13; 0.52 0.001
Gestational age
    Gestational age at birth, weeks 0.18 0.12; 0.24 <0.001

R2 per model 0.008 0.035 0.137

Values are regression coefficients with 95% confidence intervals

a

Multiple linear regression analyses; significant results are presented in bold (p<0.05)