Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Jul 1;146(1):705. doi: 10.1121/1.5119226

Table 2.

Subject demographics: sex, age (yrs), etiology of deafness, duration since implanted (yrs), duration of deafness (yrs), device type, electrode type, coding strategy, pulse width (μs) and implanted ear.

Subject Identifier Sex Age Etiology of deafness Duration implanted Duration of deafness Device Electrode Strategy Pulse width Implanted ear
S1 AB25 f 65 Sinus infection / post-ling. 3 34 Naida
Q90
HiFocus
MS
HiRes
Optima-S
18 R
S2 AB6 f 70 Unknown / Peri-ling. 6 65 Naida
Q70
HiFocus
1J
HiRes
Optima-S
35 R
S3 AB20 m 73 Unknown / post-ling. 3 45 Naida
Q90
HiFocus
MS
HiRes
Optima-S
29.6 R
S4 AB2 f 59 Possible otoxicity / post-ling. 3 58 Naida
Q70
HiFocus
1J
HiRes
Optima-S
31.4 L
S5 AB5 m 76 Otosclerosis / post-ling. 9 27 Harmony
90K
HiFocus
1J
HiRes -S w/
Fidelity 120
18 L
S6 AB23 f 57 Enlarged vestibular aqueduct / post-ling. 3 58 Naida
Q90
HiFocus
MS
HiRes
Optima-S
23.3 R
S7 AB24 f 49 Unknown / post-ling. 3 4 Naida
Q90
HiFocus
MS
HiRes
Optima-S
36.8 L
S8 AB3 m 72 Otosclerosis / post-ling. progression 11 36 Naida
Q70
HiFocus
1J
HiRes
Optima-S
29.6 L
S9 AB26 f 57 Unknown / post-ling. 5 21 Naida
Q70
HiFocus
MS
HiRes
Optima-S
22.4 L
S10 AB19 m 74 Unknown 3 n.a. Naida
Q90
HiFocus
MS
HiRes
Optima-S
30.5 L