Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 12;45(10):1333–1346. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05707-w

Table 2.

Summary of studies evaluating RRT-related interventions for HIRRT in critically ill patients.

Study Design Intervention(s) Occurrence of HIRRT Significance
Intermittent hemodialysis
 Lynch [82]

Retrospective cohort

N = 191 patients; 892 sessions

Dialysate sodium profiling

Case: 36/242 = 14.9%

Control: 59/650 = 9.1%

NS
 du Cheyron [83]

RCT

N = 74 patients; 574 sessions

Blood volume and temperature control

BVM: 33/190 = 17.4%

BVM + BTM: 30/194 = 15.5%

Control: 32/188 = 17.0%

NS
 du Cheyron et al. [57]

Prospective cohort

N = 62 patients; 572 sessions

Blood volume and temperature control

Case: 41/189 = 21.7%

Control: 110/383 = 28.7%

P = 0.09
 Schortgen et al. [5]

Retrospective cohort

N = 121 patients; 537 sessions

Multimodal approach

Case: 176/289 = 60.9%

Control: 176/248 = 71.0%

P = 0.015
 Paganini et al. [34]

Randomized cross-over study

N = 10 patients; 60 sessions

Variable dialysate sodium and UF profiling

Case: 16.0%

Control: 45.5%

Not reported
 Jardin et al. [41]

Prospective cohort

N = 8 patients; 53 sessions

17.5% albumin priming vs saline Albumin: stable MAP and more UF (530 mL/h vs 366 mL/h)

MAP: P < 0.001

Not reported for UF

Sustained low-efficiency dialysis
 Edrees et al. [58]

Randomized cross-over study

N = 21 patients; 78 sessions

Lower dialysate temperature (35 °C vs 37 °C)

Case: 0.7 ± 0.7

Control: 1.5 ± 1.1

P < 0.0001
 Albino [84]

RCT

N = 75 patients; 195 sessions

Duration of RRT: 6 h vs 10 h

6 h: 63/100 = 63.0%

10 h: 53/95 = 55.8%

NS
 Lima et al. [33]

RCT

N = 39 patients; 62 sessions

Lower dialysate temperature with dialysate sodium and UF profiling

Case: 8/34 = 23.5%

Control: 16/28 = 57.1%

P = 0.009
Continuous renal replacement therapy
 Robert et al. [60]

Randomized cross-over study

N = 30 patients

Lower heating device temperature (36 °C vs 38 °C) Less interventions for HIRRT with cooler temperature P = 0.08
 Eastwood et al. [46]

Prospective cohort

N = 21 patients; 41 RRT starts

CRRT pump speed No HIRRT reported at CRRT initiation Not applicable
 Rokyta et al. [59]

Prospective cohort

N = 9 patients

CRRT-induced cooling (SF and RB warmed to 37 °C vs no warming) MAP and SVR increased with cooling P < 0.05

Adapted from Douvris et al. [9] under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

BVM blood volume monitoring, BTM blood temperature monitoring, CRRT continuous renal replacement therapy, HIRRT hemodynamic instability related to renal replacement therapy, MAP mean arterial pressure, RCT randomized controlled trial, SF substitution fluid, RB returned blood, UF ultrafiltration