Skip to main content
. 2019 May 24;35(10):1755–1763. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01628-3

Table 3.

Results of 3D coronary analysis

Parameters In-stent restenosis (n = 44)a Control (n = 84)a p value
Proximal pre-stent BA (°) 6.85 (IQR 4.83, 12.8) 6.85 (IQR 3.63, 9.9) 0.17
Proximal post-stent BA (°) 4.84 (IQR 2.43, 10.78) 5.05 (IQR 2.63, 8.48) 0.54
Change in proximal BA after stenting (°)  − 0.60 (IQR − 5.4, 3.78)  − 1.50 (IQR − 4.28, 1.75) 0.77
Distal pre-stent BA (°) 8.10 (IQR 2.93, 12.23) 6.50 (IQR 3.33, 10.9) 0.51
Distal post-stent BA (°) 5.05 (IQR 2.3, 8) 5.40 (IQR 2.73, 9.25) 0.64
Change in distal BA after stenting (°)  − 1.85 (IQR − 5.58, 1.55)  − 0.55 (IQR − 4.28, 2.85) 0.41
Pre-stent ACr (%) 106 (IQR 103, 112) 105 (IQR 103, 107) 0.04
Post-stent ACr (%) 104 (IQR 102, 108) 104 (IQR 102, 105) 0.36
Change in ACr after stenting (%)  − 2 (IQR − 4, − 1)  − 1 (IQR − 3, 0) 0.03

As an index of statistical significance, a p value < 0.05 was accepted and marked bold

ACr arc-chord ratio, BA bending angle, IQR interquartile range

aAll cases were analysed twice, in systole and in diastole